For solo and small law firms · in development

Use AI on client work — governed.

Your client's data goes only where you have approved, never to a model that trains on it, and every AI action is recorded with what it touched and under what consent.

School policy · research memosynthetic test matter
AI request
Task
Summarize · 1 document
Model
claude-opus-5-5
Policy
Allowed · firm_internal
Recorded
Sources, model, retention, consent
Citations in the output · verdict.io
  • found347 U.S. 483
  • coverage gap612 U.S. 902outside the volumes checked — not a finding of fabrication
How it works

The same AI, with the supervision your bar expects.

The risk is not the cloud. It is a privileged document pasted into a consumer chatbot with no record. verdict.one puts one governed path between your matters and every model.

  1. 01

    Policy before anything is sent

    Every matter and document carries a sensitivity. Before any AI call, verdict.one checks it against the providers your firm has approved — and, for privileged work in the cloud, the client consent on file. A denial is recorded too.

  2. 02

    Every AI action is recorded

    Which matter, which document versions, which model, under which retention and which consent — written to the matter's audit trail before the request leaves, and closed when it returns.

  3. 03

    Every citation is checked

    AI output goes through verdict.io's verification. Each authority comes back found, flagged for review, or outside the covered volumes — and a coverage gap is never called a fabrication.

  4. 04

    A record you can stand behind

    A compliance report for each matter states, in plain sentences, what AI touched, where it ran, and what was verified — ready for a court's AI-disclosure order or a client's question.

Where data goes

You decide where each matter's data may go.

CloudPrimary

A closed frontier model

Claude, through verdict.one's governed gateway. A model that does not train on your clients' data, used only for matters and labels your firm approved.

Firm-controlledOptional

An open-weight model on your hardware

For sealed matters and clients who forbid third-party processing: the same governance, with inference on a machine your firm controls.

NeverDenied

Models that train on input

Confidential work is never sent to a provider that trains on it unless a client has consented — and that consent is recorded on the matter.

Verification

Checked, and honest about what could not be checked.

A result is either found, flagged for your review, or outside what the checker covers. “Could not verify” never means “fabricated”, and an absence is never clearance. You decide; the record shows what was checked.

separate educational facilities are inherently unequal

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) · quotation matched by verdict.io

Ecosystem

Built on the Verdict family, not beside it.

verdict.ioLive

Citation, quotation and AI-output verification behind every check.

verdict.usComing

Alerts when a provision your matter relies on changes — matched on your side, never by sending your list.

Case searchComing

Full-text and semantic search across U.S. case law, inside the matter.

In private development.

verdict.one is being built with a small group of solo and small firms. Early access opens soon.

Built for lawyer supervision, not autonomy · AI output requires attorney review